How Good Are Those Young Earth Arguments?

How Good Are Those Young-Earth Arguments?
A Close Look at Young-Earth Arguments and Other Claims
by Dave E. Matson

Hovind attacks radiocarbon dating Atmospheric Carbon-14 equilibrium

Hovind attacks the geologic column Calibration with carbon-14

Some additional topics examined

Miscellaneous topics

Appendix I: Another fatal problem for the vapor canopy idea
Appendix II: A fatal heat and radiation problem for the young-earth idea
References

For an alternative "creation" view-point, see this post, when modern Science and Genesis, can be reconciled and harmonized... the truth speaks for itself.

They said it couldn't be done, but here it is, thanks to modern science and praise to God.
"The various attempts to join together the biblical account of creation and evolution are not supportable by the various gap theories because the order of creation is in direct opposition to the views of modern science (e.g., the creation of trees before light.)"
Source: King James Hebrew-Greek KeyWord Study Bible, AMG Publishers, 1991
Yes, finally, trees exactly as described in Genesis, before, and without sunlight. And no, it's not another lame hoax. (Short) and (Long). See, Prototaxites, Fossilized "Fruiting Fungi," 'Tree'.

Prototaxites, A Fossil Fruiting Fungi, 'Tree'

Besides science discovering this fossilized, non-photosynthetic, fruiting "tree," Genesis does not mention flowers (Angiosperms), which supports Old Earth Evolution. How odd for "mere mythology".